The Wall Street Journal posted an article on Friday about DVRs and new features–like programming shows via cell phones and movie downloads from the Internet.
Although the article is mostly a re-hash of current DVR features and some recent news, one interesting tidbit is that Cablevision is looking to do away with a set-top DVR and give subscribers storage space within its network for recording shows.
This would cut costs and make DVRs more invisible and accessible to users. But the WSJ says that Hollywood doesn’t like network DVRs because they violate their copyrights.
How can this be? Does where and how you store content affect the legality? Or is it just another battle between Hollywood content providers and cable/satellite companies?
I don’t know if I would like the networked DVR. I enjoy having complete control of my content on a set-top-box that I own and have in my house. Having my cable company in control seems like they might dictate what I can and cannot do with shows that I record.
And how about using my DVR as a media hub? I like being able to watch Internet content on my TV with Tivo, or watching photos from my networked PCs on my TV. Would I lose this ability with a networked DVR?
Still, I can think of a few good things about a networked DVR:
- Unlimited Storage Space. Hopefully, my cable company wouldn’t limit how much storage I have. One way to make money from this is to offer consumers tiers of storage space, so those who save lots of TV shows can pay more per month, for example.
- One Less Box Under the TV. If I didn’t have my set-top DVR, I’d have less clutter and more space for something else. Like a new Xbox 360 or Wii, for example.
- Not Having to Upgrade to New DVR. Tivo Series 1 users wouldn’t have to upgrade to a Series 2 or 3. They can just upgrade to the next tier. The same thing should be possible when you upgrade to HD and don’t want to spend $800 on a Tivo Series 3.
- Backups of DVR Content. I’d hate to lose shows that I’ve been saving for weeks or months. Having them stored off site would be great in case my DVR suddenly conks out and loses all my shows.
- Not Buying Multiple DVRs for Every Room. This can save consumers lots of money if they don’t have to buy a separate DVR for every room. Renting an extra set-top box, for example, is much better than buying another HD DVR.
Even with a networked DVR, I’d still like to download shows to my home computer, and save them on DVDs. Perhaps the cable company will be forced by Hollywood to charge a fee for users that do this. If the fee was affordable enough, like a few dollars per show, I wouldn’t mind.
So what do you think? Are network DVRs the future? What are the plusses and minuses? Will Tivo remain viable if cable and satellite companies turn to network DVRs instead?